Archive for the ‘Online Marketing’ Category

Good article about social media marketing

Monday, October 25th, 2010

Came across this article today that offer some valuable insight into the amorphous issue of marketing via social media.

Basically there are seven tips to staying on top of social media. Here are the summation of the 7 points:

1) Look for more content to be produced by “others”. This means look for the rise of the "professional" content creators masking as citizen journalists. There will be more fake reviews and articles to help maintain a company's reputation.

2) There will be more niches in social media.

3) Mobile you must. Mobile marketing will be THE social platform.

4) Social data will impact your future business engagements.

5) Engagement strategies will be different on every channel because of the data returned from #4.

6) Do damage control AHEAD of time. Mitigating loss of control in social media will continue to be underserved and undervalued.

7) Search will still rule, but social search will drive future customer engagement.

Here is a link to the full article http://www.onlinemarketingconnect.com/frame/index.php?url=http://directmarketingobservations.com/2010/10/15/7-tips-for-staying-on-top-of-the-social-wave/

How to Restore your Lost Rankings on Google

Friday, June 25th, 2010

How to Restore your Lost Rankings on Google by David Web of Web Pro World

Is your website Out of Google Index ? Are you thinking that backlinks have effected your website's position on Google? Think Twice.

We have observed various cases where websites which were not being optimized in any way moved out of Google index. So we know 100% that it was not a case of paid links, back links, or free links. However, with careful analysis of one of our client website we observed that some competitor created a duplicate website and VOILA search engine ( The Mighty Google) threw the client's original website in Supplement index. The duplicate version of the website started to show on search results and the original one was out of Google index.

I assured the client that your penalty has little to do with paid links. We immediately asked the client to change their content on the homepage and then it was Bingo ! The site jumped back within 15 days flat.

We have seen various factors which are completely unrelated to SEO and can seriously affect your website.

In case your website is out of Google index, follow these simple guideline:-

a) Check if someone has copied your content or you have copied content from somewhere. There are cases where your content writer might copy content from some website without your knowledge. Some people argue that supplement index is not penalty, but I can assure you supplement index means out of Google Index.

b) Check if you have overstuffed your pages with your target keywords.

c) Remove Meta Keywords from your main pages if you have overstuffed meta keywords tag.

d) Ensure that you have keyword density of around 2-3% for 250-500 words page.

e) Remove excessive H1, H2 tags from your website.

f) Check if you have added duplicate listing in Google Local Business or Google Places.

We also observed one of our client website being moved out of Google Index because someone from their office submitted a duplicate Google Places listing using a new number. The moment we removed the duplicate listing from Google Places, the site jumped back to previous position within 15 minutes [It was faster than Bullet Train]. I was wondering either God must be crazy or Google must be crazy to add these sort of rules in their algorithm.

We have personally observed that Google does not necessarily give you penalty for back links. There are several vulnerable areas in Google and if you happen to be close to any of these areas, your website will move out of Google index.

Analyze each and every aspect of your website. If most of the websites move out of Google index for purchasing links then any competitor can get another competitor penalized on Google. This is not always the case, so if you find your website moved out of Google index, simply analyze each and every aspect of your website whether it is content, keyword density, affiliate links, or even Google Places Listing.

Best of Luck with your website's Optimization

Google may be in big, big trouble

Friday, June 25th, 2010

Multi-State Investigation Launched Against Google
Wi-Fi probe may involve over 30 Attorneys General

Google may be in big, big trouble. Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, who was the first Attorney General to scrutinize the company over its collection of sensitive WiFi data, is now leading a probe in which officials representing more than 30 states have expressed interest.

French data protection agency claimed that Google managed to collect people's passwords and comprehensible parts of emails, not just random 1s and 0s.

REF: http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/20...against-google

Google has defended its collection of the data saying it was done "accidentally". Google boss Eric Schmidt said there was "no harm, no foul" in collecting the snippets of information.

Social Media for Business to Business

Wednesday, September 2nd, 2009

SEO prodigy recent came across an excellent article title "5 Social Media Marketing Best Practices for B2B" from the respected Inside Techology Marketing publication.   We echo many of the strategies and approaches to social media marketing that is explained in this white paper.

http://www.btobonline.com/assets/pdf/CT6644283.PDF?title=5+Social+Media+Marketing+Best+Practices+for+B2B

Possible Yahoo! Microsoft Merger?

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

SEO Prodigy recently came across a good article from Micahel liedtke and Jessica Mintz of AP Technology.  It looks the number 2 and number 3 of search engines are going to try to take on the number one Google. 

SAN FRANCISCO – Microsoft Corp. has finally roped Yahoo Inc. into an Internet search partnership, capping a convoluted pursuit that dragged on for years and finally setting the stage for them to make a joint assault against the dominance of Google Inc.

The 10-year deal announced Wednesday gives Microsoft access to the Internet's second-largest search engine audience, adding a potentially potent weapon to the software maker's Internet arsenal as it tries to better confront Google, which is by far the leader in online search and advertising. Microsoft didn't have to give Yahoo an upfront payment to make it happen, as many Yahoo investors had hoped.

Google tried to stop Yahoo from falling into Microsoft's camp. Last year it formed its own proposed search advertising deal with Yahoo, only to be forced to retreat from that alliance after U.S. antitrust officials threatened to sue.

The extended reach will allow Microsoft to introduce its recently upgraded search engine, called Bing, to more people. The Redmond, Wash.-based software maker believes Bing is just as good, if not better, than Google's search engine. Taking over the search responsibilities on Yahoo's highly trafficked site gives Microsoft a better chance to convert Web surfers who had been using Google by force of habit.

"Microsoft and Yahoo know there's so much more that search could be," said Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer. "This agreement gives us the scale and resources to create the future of search."

Even with Yahoo's help, Microsoft still has its work cut out. Combined, Microsoft and Yahoo handle 28 percent of the Internet searches in the United States, well behind Google's 65 percent, according to online measurement firm comScore Inc. Google is even more dominant in the rest of the world, with a global share of 67 percent compared to a combined 11 percent for Microsoft and Yahoo.

In return for turning over the keys to its search engine to Bing and promoting it, Yahoo will get to keep 88 percent of the revenue from all ads that run alongside search requests on its site for the first five years of the deal. Yahoo also will have the right to sell ads on some Microsoft sites.

Yahoo estimated the deal will boost its annual operating profit by $500 million and save the Sunnyvale, Calif.-based company about $275 million on capital expenditures a year because it won't have to invest in its own search technology. An unspecified number of Yahoo engineers will lose their jobs as the company scales back, Yahoo Chief Executive Carol Bartz told analysts in a Wednesday conference call.

But the deal isn't expected to close until early next year, and then it could take another two years before all the pieces of the partnership are in place worldwide. The companies first will give antitrust regulators time to review the proposed partnership's effects on the Internet ad market and then it will take time to stitch together their different technologies.

Shares of Yahoo slid $1.68, or 9.8 percent, to $15.54, as investors expressed disappointment over the fact that the company won't be getting an immediate windfall. Microsoft shares advanced 14 cents to $23.61. Google shares fell $5.51, 1.3 percent, to $434.34.

The alliance could give Yahoo a chance to recoup some of the money it squandered in May 2008, when it turned down a chance to sell the entire company to Microsoft for $47.5 billion. Yahoo's market value currently stands at about $22 billion.

The two rivals began talking about a possible partnership as far back as 2005 before Microsoft intensified the courtship with last year's attempt to buy Yahoo.

It took Bartz just six months to strike a deal with Microsoft — something that neither of her predecessors, Terry Semel and Yahoo co-founder Jerry Yang, seemed interested in doing.

Shortly after her arrival, Bartz made it clear she was willing to farm out Yahoo's search engine for "boatloads of money" as long as she as thought the company would still receive adequate information about its users' interests. Although Yahoo won't get any immediate cash, Bartz predicted the deal will still be a boon for the company.

"This agreement comes with boatloads of value for Yahoo, our users, and the industry, and I believe it establishes the foundation for a new era of Internet innovation and development," Bartz said Wednesday.

Under the agreement, Yahoo will have limited access to the data on users' searches — which yield insights that can be used to pick out ads more likely to pique a person's interest. The value of that information is why Microsoft wants to process more search requests.

Like Yahoo, Microsoft has invested billions in its search technology during the past decade, yet remained a distant third in market share while its online losses piled up. The company's Internet services division lost $2.3 billion in the fiscal year ending in June, nearly doubling from the previous year.

Microsoft is counting on Bing, unveiled in early June, to turn things around.

Bing has been getting mostly positive reviews and picking up slightly more traffic with the help of a $100 million marketing campaign. Analysts believe Bing's successful debut pushed Microsoft to reopen negotiations so it could expose its search engine improvements to a wider audience more quickly.

"The reason the deal happened now is the recent success of Bing. I think it put pressure on Yahoo, as well as Yahoo not being able to turn it around on its own," said Gartner Inc. analyst Neil MacDonald.

Microsoft and Yahoo are bracing for antitrust scrutiny into whether the combination would have an adverse effect on competition in the online ad market.

The U.S. Justice Department spent five months dissecting last year's proposed search advertising partnership between Google and Yahoo before concluding that it would give Google too much control over the market. And under the Obama administration, the Justice Department is promising to pore over deals far more rigorously than it did when the proposed Google-Yahoo partnership came up.

Microsoft used its lobbying muscle to spearhead the campaign against Google teaming up with Yahoo, so it wouldn't be a surprise if Google turned the tables.

"There has traditionally been a lot of competition online, and our experience is that competition brings about great things for users," Google spokesman Adam Kovacevich said. "We're interested to learn more about the deal."

A key lawmaker on antitrust issues said the Yahoo-Microsoft plan "warrants our careful scrutiny." Sen. Herb Kohl, a Wisconsin Democrat, said the Senate antitrust subcommittee he chairs will review the deal "because of the potentially far-reaching consequences for consumers and advertisers and our concern about dampening the innovation we have come to expect from a competitive high-tech industry."

Peter Kaplan, a spokesman for the Federal Trade Commission, declined to comment. A spokeswoman for the Justice Department couldn't immediately be reached for comment.

Ballmer expects that support from online advertisers and Web publishers who would like a stronger rival to Google will eclipse any objections that Google might raise.

"We think this is one of these cases where the coming together will produce more effective market competition, not less," he told analysts in Wednesday's conference call.

Just getting Yahoo to succumb to its latest advance represents a coup for Microsoft and the boisterous Ballmer, who was rebuffed for so long.

Microsoft is doubling down on Internet search at the same time Google is attacking Microsoft's bread-and-butter business of making software for personal computers.

Google is working on a free operating system for inexpensive personal computers in a move that could threaten Microsoft's ubiquitous Windows franchise. If it gains traction, Google's alternative, called Chrome OS, could divert some revenue from Microsoft while the software maker is trying to grab more of the money pouring into search advertising.

Chrome OS, though, isn't supposed to hit the market until the second half of next year. That means Microsoft could get a head start on Google in the duel to steal each other's financial thunder.

 

What is Bing? Possible Google Killer?

Thursday, June 18th, 2009

Lately you probably been hearing alot about the new "Bing". I really like how microsoft has been marketing this search engine. Check out this commercial they have been airing

Bing Search Engine

I really like how Microsoft has been marketing this new search engine. The microsoft branding department managed to come up with tacky, catchy phrase: ring ring....it's Bing!

So what is Bing (orginally called "Kumo)? It is a rebranded microsoft live search engine that provides decision based results. So here is an example for a search done for "New York City Hotels"

What is Bing?  Possible Google Killer?

Notice how the search results include a left hand column read "RELATED SEARCHES" and "SEARCH HISTORY". There are also options for video/shopping results at the top.

Microsofts objective is to provide better interaction provide more relevant results that are in line with a user's "decision". So are you looking for a hotel in general manhattan or times square?

Aesthetically Bing is prettier than Google too. They were able to accomplish this without having to take away from the simplicity that most searchers prefer (and what made Google famous).

So will Bing overtake Google? Very unlikely, but not impossible. At the time Bing appears to serve as a bona fide alternative for internet searches. We only wonder why they didn't use an exclamation point i.e. Bing! to accentuate a poignancy that made Yahoo! famous years ago.

SEO Prodigy on Twitter

Monday, June 15th, 2009

Do you like reading our blog?  Do you like twitter?  SEO Prodigy has now integrated all of our new blog posts on Twitter.   Our twitter url at http://twitter.com/seoprodigy.

So what's the use of twitter for business?  Argueably many things, but here are a few notables:

1.  Can drive more traffic to your website

2.  Opens up direct communication with your clients and customers

3.  Quickly communicate promotions, changes and updates about your businesses

4.  Twitter is a great place to get advice about issues

5.  Can be used for backlinking

There are also special tools such as Tweetdeck and Twirl which make tweeting easier.

Don’t get confused, seo isn’t dead…but rank reporting is going obsolete.

Saturday, June 13th, 2009

Within the recent month's the major search engines, particulary the almightly Google have made some very drastic algorithm updates which have been tossing up search engine rankings like an ocean tempest.  Reliable search engine "ranking reports" are now thing a thing of the past for most search engines (especially Google).   So for example lets say that you own a flower delivery service website.  On your own computer you are ranking on page 1 of Google for "flower delivery".  On another computer a mile away your website listed on page 3 for the exact same phrase. on another computer a few miles away your website is on page 4, then on the computer in building next to you you are listed nowhere at all.  

Why is this happening?  There are several reasons, but one particular major change is due to what search engines call "personalized search engine results".  So lets say you are working in a office and you have a co-worker who is a programmer.   You happen to work in public relations and you love coffee.  You both do a google search for the keyword "java".   You get results about coffee.  He gets results about programming language.  He is only a few feet away.   Why is this?  Google is now looking at your past search history and delivering personalized search results on your preferences.   This is making consistent ranking for general, ambigous keywords next to useless (a trend that has been happening for years...but finally taking full effect)

It was first believed that Google would only deliver personalized search results depending if the web surfer had a Google account or not.   Some search engine optimization experts noticed that  personalized results where being observed even when web surfer had  no Google account  Also your particular location and IP address can effect your search results as well.  

So is it time to stand on your roof and yell at passerby's that "SEO is DEAD!!!" ???  What is the point in optimizing your website if you can no longer impact how the search engines rank your results?   Not so fast.

The surprising answer is SEO is still an very effective strategy for internet marketing (at least for the time being).  Why?  For ranking and indexation search engine algorithms still need to know what your website is about and your website could benefit from optimization.

Here are a few keypoints

Search Engines need to know what your website is about

Search engine algorithms still need something to grab onto to understand what your website is about.   Creating good quality content and optimizing your title, header, h1 still make a very big difference.  They can make your website show up for certain keyword searches.  So if you are selling coffee and you have your website optimized for "java" somebody searching for java (and has a history of browsing coffee sites") your optimized webpage has a much better probability of being ranked high.

Focus on traffic, forget rankings

The toughest part of this change is explaining to the average layman that keyword ranking no longer reliable.  I can't tell you how many times i have spoke with clients and the issue of  "my competitor is ranking higher than me for so and so phrase" conversation is brought up.  To absolve this issue make sure to focus more on the end product: traffic.   Having optimized webpages will help you bring in more traffic from the right visitors (higher rankings OVERALL).  Make sure to have detailed analytics reports.  Google Analytics is always a good option.

The only exception to the "ranking reports are dead" theory is if you can use a tool that checks ranking reports on multiple IP address.  There are a few out there.  One free and simple one is at http://www.seochat.com/seo-tools/multiple-datacenter-google-search/.  This tool allows you to check your search engine rankings across multiple datacenters to see how well you are ranking.    For example our website seprodigy.com was consistently ranked on the first page for "web marketing" on multiple datacenters when we tested this tool.

You can also get a good idea of how your search engine rankings are appearing by using the Google Webmaster Tools program (it's free!). This is basically a ranking report "straight from the source" where Google reports your highest viewed/clicked keywords and their average positions.

Dont get confused, seo isnt dead...but rank reporting is going obsolete.

After you activate your account you will see a option on the right hand side for "Statistics". From there click on "Top Search Queries".

Dont get confused, seo isnt dead...but rank reporting is going obsolete.

Notice how Google specifically says "from all search all locations". This is a decent indicator of how your SEO/Web Marketing efforts are panning out.

Just remember that good keyword research, content optimization and quality landing pages still goes a long, long way to getting your website better visibility.  SEO may no longer the end all, be all. But it is still a strong backbone to almost any internet marketing campaign.

Google Analytics Conversion Tracking - Increase Accuracy with utm_nooverride=1 url

Saturday, June 13th, 2009

Do you depend on Google Analytics to track goal conversions? Recently we came across a very interesting tidbit directly from Google. Check out this video

Tracking Conversions

So if you counting on Google Analytics Goal Conversion tracking and are you using 3rd party campaigns (adwords, yahoo, etc) make sure to append utm_nooverride=1 url to the tracking urls. Google claims that your original campaign will receive credit in analytics for producing a conversion.

Google Shows False Warning

Saturday, January 31st, 2009

Today while searching Google I noticed that Google is displaying a warning "This site may harm your computer" for all sites and that also includes Google.com. We have seen this warning before for specific websites under various queries but this clearly appeared to be a mess up by the Big G as the message appeared for all sites and for all queries.

If you still clicked on any of those sites ( which I did to check), it would put you on a webpage with detailed warning and three options (a) Go back and pick another site , (b) Try another search and then not so willingly (c) Or you can continue to < the site url > at your own risk. To make it further more difficult for visitors to access the site, they don't even put  the site URL as a link.

While the web is  already  saturated with discussions on this Google mess up, Marissa Mayer from Google has made a post on the official blog informing that this was a manual error and it has already been rectified. The sites were affected due to this error between 6:27 a.m. and 6:40 a.m. and began disappearing between 7:10 and 7:25 a.m., so the duration of the problem for any particular user was approximately 40 minutes. Marissa has apologized for the error and also congratulated the tech team for fixing the error so promptly.

However, this small 40 minutes mess up has actually been very costly for various webmasters as most people would not click through to a website when they see a warning for malware on the site from the "ohh-so-reliable Google. Isn't it time we think twice about our Google dependency ? and it is also proved that to maintain the trust and reliability that Internet users show on Google, they can't afford to make a single mistake . Google are you hearing?